After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these systems. Via lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used by asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series Visit Website of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to get around these systems and to pursue their legal right for coverage.

It also demonstrates how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from interacting with the channels of proper protection. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: whilst they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.